Abstract
Introduction
Muscle stiffness and joint contractures are common complications of limb lengthening. Authors have demonstrated less permanent soft tissue complications with intramedullary lengthening than external fixation. Our aim was to evaluate the joint response following intramedullary femoral lengthening and need for physiotherapy and alteration to rate/rhythm of lengthening.
Method
A retrospective review of documentation for all femoral Precice nails in our centre inserted between 2012 and 2017. This involved 98 nails (68 antegrade, 30 retrograde) in 88 patients (59 males, 29 females) with a mean age of 32 years (range 12–69 yrs). We excluded cases where there was no documentation regarding Range of Movement (ROM). Bilateral lengthenings were recorded as separate cases. This left 50 antegrade, 16 retrograde cases with hip ROM data and 55 antegrade, 26 retrograde cases with Knee ROM data.
Results
Hip In the antegrade group 20 cases (39%) developed no stiffness throughout treatment. ROM decreased in 61% (n=30) of cases and the median length at which this occurred was 3cm. Where a retrograde nail was inserted 62.5% of cases (n=10) maintained normal range of motion. The median length at which ROM decreased was 3.25cm, this occurred in 6 cases (37.5%). Knee Where the antegrade nail was inserted, 22 cases (40%) did not develop stiffness. There was reduced ROM in 33 cases (60%), occurring at a median distance of 2cm. The median distance at which reduced ROM occurred with the retrograde nails was 1.5cm, this occurred in 23 cases (88.5%). 3 cases did not develop stiffness. All cases regained full ROM.
Conclusion
Although there was no permanent loss, Joint Stiffness still occurs with intramedullary limb lengthening and there remains the need for regular physiotherapy. There are no data from other institutions for comparison. Rehabilitation guidelines and a proforma to accurately monitor patients ROM throughout treatment have been developed.
