header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Trauma

LRINEC SCORE: DOES IT SUPPORT THE DIAGNOSIS?

The Scottish Committee for Orthopaedics and Trauma (SCOT) February 2018 Meeting, Crieff, Scotland.



Abstract

The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotising Fasciitis (LRINEC) score was developed in 2004 to risk-stratify patients with soft tissue infections using common blood tests when the clinical picture is equivocal. A score ≥ 6 conferred a positive predictive value (PPV) of 92% and negative predictive value of 96% for necrotising fasciitis.

We retrospectively calculated LRINEC scores for Orthopaedic patients admitted to ITU in our hospital with limb soft-tissue infection and confirmed Group-A Streptococcus or Staphylococcus in fluid, blood, tissue or swab culture between 2010–2017 (n=10). Mean age = 57.4 and 60% were female. Half of all patients died during admission. Mean LRINEC score of all patients was 5.3±3.1 (median = 6). Mean score in deceased patients was 4.8±2.8 (scores: 0,5,6,6,7; median = 6); in discharged patients mean = 5.8±3.7 (scores: 0,5,7,7,10; median = 7). 6 patients had a score ≥6, making our PPV 60%. 4 patients had necrotising fasciitis confirmed on histology (LRINEC scores = 0,5,7,10).

Our PPV of 60% is less than the figure obtained in the original paper. 2 patients with a LRINEC score <6 died during admission, including a patient with a score of 0. Furthermore, a patient with necrotising fasciitis confirmed on histology also had a LRINEC score of 0. We conclude that LRINEC scores should not delay surgery when clinical suspicion is high, and should be used as an adjunct to clinical decision-making, rather than a replacement, as patients with low LRINEC scores can also have confirmed necrotising fasciitis and poor outcomes.


Email: