header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

COMPARISON OF SYSTEMIC AND LOCAL ADMINISTRATION OF BISPHOSPHONATES IN AN ANIMAL BONE DEFECT MODEL: THE IMPORTANCE OF LOCAL DRUG DELIVERY

The European Orthopaedic Research Society (EORS) 2018 Meeting, PART 3, Galway, Ireland, September 2018.



Abstract

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates such as Zoledronic Acid (ZA) are used clinically for the treatment of skeletal diseases related with increased bone resorption. The gold standard is to administrate the drug through a systemic pathway, however this is often associated with high dosages, risk of side-effects, reduced site-specific drug delivery and hence, limited drug-effectiveness. A controlled local drug delivery, via a biomimetic bone graft, could be beneficial by direct and time-regulated application of significantly lower drug dosage at the site of interest. Thus, higher efficacy and reduced side-effects could be expected. In this experimental in vivo study, we examined the effect of ZA when used together with a Calcium Sulphate/Hydroxyapatite biomaterial in a femoral condyle bone defect in rats and compared local to systemic administration. The following groups were used: group1: empty defect (no biomaterial & no treatment), group2: biomaterial alone, group3: biomaterial + systemic ZA (0.1mg ZA/kg – single subcutaneous injection), group4–6: biomaterial conjugated with ZA at different concentrations, (0.07 to 0.70 mg ZA/mL of paste, corresponding to 0.0024 to 0.024 mg ZA/kg). The animals were sacrificed at 6 weeks and toxicological examination was performed. Bone regeneration was evaluated using qualitative and quantitative micro-CT analysis and Histomorphometry. The results showed a significant difference between the groups, suggesting that ZA has an overall effect on bone healing. The most pronounced effect was seen with the local application of approximately 10 times less ZA-dosage when compared to systemic use (p<0.001). This study demonstrates the importance of local ZA administration in bone regeneration.


Email: