Abstract
Introduction
Adhesive capsulitis is a common condition causing painful limitation of shoulder movements. Hydrodistension is one of the techniques, is well recognised and has shown good outcomes. However, the results of hydro distension release in secondary adhesive capsulitis are not clear.
Patients and Methods
This is a retrospective study on patients undergoing hydro distension release. Patients who had any surgical intervention were classed as secondary whilst the rest were included in the primary group. The hydro distension is a standard technique where in the senior author locates the gleno humeral joint using radio opaque dye, followed by injection of 20 mls 0.5% L-bupivacaine and 80 mg of Triamcinolone, this is followed by use of 60 mls saline to perform the hydro distension.
Results
We included 86 shoulders in 80 patients who underwent the procedure. There were 46 females and 34 males, with average age of 51.07 years (range 35 – 75). Left side was involved in 42 shoulders and right in 44. 25 patients showed associated risk factors of which 17 patients had diabetes, 12 had hypercholesterolemia and 5 had underactive thyroid. 65 of the shoulders were in the primary group whilst 21 in the secondary group. In the secondary group the procedures included 8 arthroscopic subacromial decompression with ACJ excision, 7 had rotator cuff repairs, 4 had biceps labral procedure and 2 ORIF clavicle. 3/21 patients required further intervention in secondary group, whilst 10/65 in the primary group required further intervention. Patients who have history of inflammatory arthritides were found to have higher incidence of revision surgery and poorer outcomes. 85% patients in both groups had improvement in their function and range of movements and were happy with the outcome.
Conclusion
Hydrodistension provides safe and predictive results in both primary and secondary adhesive capsulitis and should be considered as an option before any invasive procedure.
