Abstract
This is the first study in the Ponseti-era to compare severity and outcomes in cases of idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) diagnosed antenatally versus those diagnosed at birth. Small pre-Ponseti studies showed antenatal diagnosis to be a predictor of severity and poor prognosis.
Prospective data collection was used to compare indicators of severity and outcomes for idiopathic CTEV between these two groups. These include Pirani score, number of casts, follow-up Roye score and need for surgery.
68 children with 106 affected feet were included. Antenatal diagnosis (AD) was made in 45 children (71 feet), with birth diagnosis (BD) in 23 children (35 feet). Mean follow-up age was 4.8 years (AD = 4.9, BD = 4.7), male:female ratio 2:1 (AD=BD) with bilateral CTEV in 55% (AD = 58%, BD=52%). Mean initial Pirani scores were 5.25 in the AD group vs 4.86 in the BD group (p=0.06). Mean Roye score at follow-up was 1.39/4 in the AD group vs 1.26/4 in the BD group (p=0.33) with 33% vs 30% complaining of pain respectively (p=0.80). Surgery was needed in 11/71 (15.5%) in the AD group vs 1/35 (2.9%) in the BD group (p=0.06))
There is no significant difference in severity between antenatal and birth diagnoses of idiopathic CTEV and no difference in outcomes between these groups when treated with the Ponseti regime. Although small, our sample size is greater than the largest published comparable study.
