Abstract
Purpose: The glenoid status is a crucial aspect of planning for shoulder replacements. This study revisits the classification proposed by Walch et al and discusses its value to orthopedic surgeons in terms of reproducibility and reliability.
Method: Three evaluators viewed one hundred-sixteen (116) shoulder CT-scans with primary glenohumeral arthritis and classified glenoid wear according to Walch classification two times. The validation study was done for three sets of data: Set I: the complete classification: A1, A2, B1, B2, C. Set II: regrouping with main categories: A,B,C. Set III: regrouping categories according to glenoid facet morphology; Normal concavity: A1, A2, B1; Biconcave glenoid: B2; Retroverted glenoid: C.
Results: Intra-observer Kappa values for Observer 1, 2, and 3 averaged 0.866 (0.899, 0.927, 0.773) for Set I; for Set II, the values averaged 0.915 (0.955, 0.975, 0.814); and for Set III, the values averaged 0.874 (0.897, 0.948, 0.777), all excellent values. Inter-observer reliability values for Set I averaged 0.621 (0.776, 0.512, 0.574), indicating good agreement; for Set II, the values averaged 0.759 (0.880, 0.713, 0.685), indicating excellent inter-observer agreement; and for Set III, the average was 0.642 (0.825, 0.519, 0.581), indicating good inter-observer agreement.
Conclusion: A clarification of the Walch et al classification of the osteoarthritic glenoid was necessary, especially with regards to the wordings of categories B2 and C. When used properly, it is a reliable and valuable tool for orthopedic surgeons of all levels of experience in the evaluation of the osteoarthritic glenohumeral joint.
Correspondence should be addressed to: COA, 4150 Ste. Catherine St. West Suite 360, Westmount, QC H3Z 2Y5, Canada. Email: meetings@canorth.org
