170 – COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING MINIMALLY INVASIVE TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT AS COMPARED TO TRADITIONAL INCISION TECHNIQUES: A META-ANALYSIS

Abstract

Purpose: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) knee replacement surgery has experienced a recent surge in popularity, driven by the patient concerns of a faster recovery time and a shorter, more cosmetic scar. However the evaluation of any new medical therapy must include a detailed evaluation of both efficacy and safety outcomes. The primary objective of our meta-analysis was to compare the incidence of complications between minimally invasive(MIS) and standard total knee replacement (TKR) approaches.

Method: We reviewed randomized controlled trials comparing minimally invasive TKR to standard TKR. After testing for publication bias and heterogeneity, the data were aggregated by random-effects modeling. Our primary outcome was the number of complications. Our secondary outcomes were alignment outliers, Knee Society Function Scores, and Knee Society Knee Scores.

Results: We had a total of 9 studies evaluating our primary outcome. Average follow up time ranged from 3 to 28 months. There was no significant publication bias in our study.

The combined odds ratios for complications for the MIS group and alignment outliers were 1.58 (95% CI: 1.01 to 2.47) p< 0.05 and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.34 to 1.82) p=0.58 respectively. The standard difference in means for Knee Society scores was no different between groups.

Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis demonstrate a statistically significant increase in complication rates with MIS TKR when compared to standard TKR. There were no significant differences in postoperative alignment or KSS at 3 months between the two groups. MIS knee surgery should be approached with caution.