Abstract
Purpose: Even with modern ancillary and good surgical experience, rotational implant positioning is sometimes sub-optimal, leading to poor results. Except for obvious cases with patellar instability, the symptoms are often vague and non-contributive to the diagnosis of failure. This is why implant malpositioning and particularly malrotational postioning remain an underestimated cause of failure after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We report our experience with TKA revision for rotational malpositioning.
Method: We retrospectively assessed the results of TKA revisions in 22 knees for malrotational positioning. In all cases, malrotational implant positioning was confirmed by CT-scan according to Berger’s protocol.
Results: Mean age was 66 years (47–74) at the time of the primary TKA. After the index procedure, all patients presented early anterior knee pain with patellar instability (tilt and subluxation in ten cases, and permanent patellar dislocation in two cases). Malrotational positioning predominated on the tibial component with mean 23° internal rotation. Mean cumulative malrotation (tibial plus femur) was 22° internal rotation. All but four patients underwent femoral and tibial component revision. In two cases, only the tibial component was revised, and in two other cases, isolated transposition of the anterior tibial tuberosity was carried out. One was a failure, and finally underwent a successful full revision. At a mean follow-up of 30 months (12–60), we noted significant functional outcome improvement. One patient, who underwent a patellectomy previously at the index TKA procedure, had persistant anterior knee pain. No patient presented patellar instability.
Conclusion: The diagnosis of implant malrotational positioning is sometimes difficult. The most common errors are tibial component positioning. In case of suspicion of malrotational positioning, protocolized CT-scan allows quick and simple diagnosis. If the malrotation is confirmed, TKA revision should be performed upon patient disability and severity of the symptoms. It is important not to delay the surgery, particularly in cases of patellofemoral dislocation because of the risks of developing soft tissue contractures resulting in a more difficult revision procedure.
Correspondence should be addressed to: COA, 4150 Ste. Catherine St. West Suite 360, Westmount, QC H3Z 2Y5, Canada. Email: meetings@canorth.org
