70 – A RANDOMISED TRIAL TO EVALUATE THE CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND OUTCOMES OF THE “ABDUCTOR SPARING” MIS ANTEROLATERAL APPROACH IN PRIMARY TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and outcomes of the ‘abductor sparing’ MIS Anterolateral approach (MIS Watson Jones/G3) in comparison to the MIS Direct Lateral and MIS Posterolateral approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Method: A multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate for the superiority of the new MIS Anterolateral approach (MIS Watson Jones/ G3). The sample size calculation was performed for alpha .05, power .90, to evaluate for effect size 0.5 in WOMAC using repeated measures analyses with baseline WOMAC as covariate. A total of 156 patients consented to participate in the trial and patients were assigned to MIS Antero-lateral approach or alternate MIS approach (MIS Direct Lateral or MIS Posterolateral). Patients were subjected to standardized anaesthetic and perioperative management protocols and were evaluated at standardized intervals to evaluate endpoints of early recovery (3 months) as well as endpoints of 12 and 24 months respectively. The primary outcome of interest was WOMAC, however secondary outcomes included SF-36, as well as parameters of health resource utilization and complications. Univariate and multivariate analyses were perfomed.

Results: Patient groups were found to be similar at baseline with regards to demographics and baseline quality of life outcomes (p> .05). Multivariate and repeated measures analyses demonstrated no superiority of the MIS Anterolateral approach on outcomes of WOMAC and other quality of life measures in comparison to MIS Direct Lateral and MIS Posterolateral approaches (p> .05). Health care resource utlization was also similar with length of stay, blood transfusion requirements and complications (p> .05).

Conclusion: Our multicentre, prospective, randomized clinical trial demonstrates that the MIS Anterolateral approach is not superior to alternate MIS surgical approaches when evaluating outcomes of quality of life, complications, and health resource utilization. Surgeons should consider these outcomes, complications, and other relevant advantages and disadvantages of select surgical approaches when deciding on a technique for use in their orthopaedic practice.