Abstract
Purpose: It is thought that the anterior approach better restores gait mechanics after total hip arthroplasty (THA) being a pure intermuscular/internervous approach. The purpose of this study was to compare three-dimensional (3-D) kinematics and kinetics of THA patients that had an anterior (ANT) vs. a lateral (LAT) approach. It is hypothesized that the ANT group will exhibit fewer differences than the LAT group when compared to a control group (CON).
Method: Fifty-four participants were divided into three groups of 18: ANT (12 women, 6 men; age: 60.9 ± 6.2 yr; BMI: 28.8 ± 4.9 kg/m2), LAT (10 women, 8 men; age: 65.2 ± 6.3 yr; BMI: 27.5 ± 5.1 kg/m2) and CON (9 women, 9 men; age: 63.9 ± 4.4 yr; BMI: 25.4 ± 3.2 kg/ m2). All THA patients had primary unilateral THA due to osteoarthritis and had no other lower-limb pathology. They were evaluated five to 17 months after surgery. 3-D kinematics and kinetics were obtained using a nine-camera motion analysis system and a force platform placed on the first step of a staircase. Each participant performed three trials of stair ascending. A series of one-way ANOVAs were used to compare peak angles, range of motion (ROM), peak resultant joint forces as well as moments and powers of the hip, knee and ankle joints in all three planes.
Results: Most differences occurred during transitions between double- to single-legged stance. Both LAT and ANT groups ascended the staircase with a more abducted hip than the CON group, resulting in reduced hip abduction moment. This could be the result of the implant’s position and its potential abductor lever arm reduction. Both groups also showed reduced peak internal rotation moments. These results have previously been found in THA patients who have been operated through lateral and posterior approaches, and are thought to be caused by hip abductor muscle damage inherent to the surgical approach. However, only the LAT group had lower compression forces at the hip, knee and ankle joints compared to the CON group. This indicates that LAT group uses a strategy that reduces the loading on the operated leg, which may be due to the detachment of the anterior third of the gluteus medius. It could be speculated that the muscle sparing aspect of ANT approach allows patients to load adequately their operated leg, even if their frontal plane kinematics and kinetics are altered.
Conclusion: Some studies have failed to find differences with the anterior approach. However, they have only looked at spatiotemporal gait parameters. 3-D kinematics and kinetics can provide a more detailed assessment of function and detect more subtle differences. In this study, 3-D biomechanical analysis has detected differences in THA patients operated through different surgical approaches during stair ascent. The data obtained showed similar frontal plane kinematics for both groups, but different lower-limb compression forces. This study supports the use of the anterior approach for better restoration of function after total hip arthroplasty.
Correspondence should be addressed to: COA, 4150 Ste. Catherine St. West Suite 360, Westmount, QC H3Z 2Y5, Canada. Email: meetings@canorth.org
