Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

1 – ENDOTHELIAL PROGENITOR CELLS FOR HEALING OF SEGMENTAL BONE DEFECTS: A RADIOGRAPHIC, MICROCT, AND BIOMECHANICAL STUDY IN RATS



Abstract

Purpose: Severe fractures damage blood vessels and disrupt circulation at the fracture site resulting in an increased risk of poor fracture healing. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are bone-marrow derived cells with the ability to differentiate into endothelial cells and contribute to neovascularization and re-endothelialization after tissue injury and ischemia. We have previously reported that EPC therapy resulted in improved radiographic healing and histological blood vessel formation in a rat fracture model. The purpose of this study was to further quantify the effects of EPC therapy with microCT and biomechanical analyses.

Method: Five-millimeter segmental defects were created and stabilized in the femora of 14 fisher 344 rats. The treatment group (n=7) received 1x106 EPCs within gelfoam locally at the area of the bone defect and control animals (n=7) received only saline-gelfoam with no cells. The formation and healing of bone after 10 weeks were asessed by radiographic, micro-CT and biomechanical analyses.

Results: Radiographically all the animals in EPC-treated group healed with bridging callus formation, whereas control group animals demonstrated radiographic non-union. Micro-CT assessment demonstrated significantly improved parameters of bone volume (35.34 to 20.68 mm3, p=0.000), bone volume density (0.24 to 0.13%, p=0.001), connectivity density (25.13 to 6.15%, p=0.030), trabecular number (1.14 to 0.51 1/mm, p=0.000), trabecular thickness (0.21 to 0.26 mm, p=0.011), trabecular spacing (0.71 to 1.88 mm, p=0.002), bone surface area (335.85 to 159.43mm, p=0.000), and bone surface to bone volume ratio (9.43 to 7.82 1/mm, p=0.013) in the defect site for the EPC group versus the control group respectively. Biomechanical testing showed that the EPC treatment group had a significantly higher torsional strength compared with the control group (EPC=164.6±27.9 Nmm, Control=29.5±3.8 Nmm; p value = 0.000). Similarly, the EPC treated fractures demonstrated significantly higher torsional stiffness versus controls (EPC=30.3±5.0 Nmm/ deg, Control=0.9±0.1 Nmm/deg; p value = 0.000). When biomechanically compared to contralateral intact limbs, the EPC treated limbs had similar torsional stiffness (p=0.996), but significantly lower torsional strength (p=0.000) and smaller angle of twist (p=0.002).

Conclusion: These results suggest that local EPC therapy significantly enhances fracture healing in an animal model. The biomechanical results show that control animals develop a mechanically unstable non-union. In contrast, EPC therapy results in fracture healing that restores the biomechanical properties of the fractured bone closer to that of intact bone.

Correspondence should be addressed to: COA, 4150 Ste. Catherine St. West Suite 360, Westmount, QC H3Z 2Y5, Canada. Email: meetings@canorth.org