Abstract
Purpose: Severe fractures damage blood vessels and disrupt circulation at the fracture site resulting in an increased risk of poor fracture healing. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are bone-marrow derived cells with the ability to differentiate into endothelial cells and contribute to neovascularization and re-endothelialization after tissue injury and ischemia. We have previously reported that EPC therapy resulted in improved radiographic healing and histological blood vessel formation in a rat fracture model. The purpose of this study was to further quantify the effects of EPC therapy with microCT and biomechanical analyses.
Method: Five-millimeter segmental defects were created and stabilized in the femora of 14 fisher 344 rats. The treatment group (n=7) received 1x106 EPCs within gelfoam locally at the area of the bone defect and control animals (n=7) received only saline-gelfoam with no cells. The formation and healing of bone after 10 weeks were asessed by radiographic, micro-CT and biomechanical analyses.
Results: Radiographically all the animals in EPC-treated group healed with bridging callus formation, whereas control group animals demonstrated radiographic non-union. Micro-CT assessment demonstrated significantly improved parameters of bone volume (35.34 to 20.68 mm3, p=0.000), bone volume density (0.24 to 0.13%, p=0.001), connectivity density (25.13 to 6.15%, p=0.030), trabecular number (1.14 to 0.51 1/mm, p=0.000), trabecular thickness (0.21 to 0.26 mm, p=0.011), trabecular spacing (0.71 to 1.88 mm, p=0.002), bone surface area (335.85 to 159.43mm, p=0.000), and bone surface to bone volume ratio (9.43 to 7.82 1/mm, p=0.013) in the defect site for the EPC group versus the control group respectively. Biomechanical testing showed that the EPC treatment group had a significantly higher torsional strength compared with the control group (EPC=164.6±27.9 Nmm, Control=29.5±3.8 Nmm; p value = 0.000). Similarly, the EPC treated fractures demonstrated significantly higher torsional stiffness versus controls (EPC=30.3±5.0 Nmm/ deg, Control=0.9±0.1 Nmm/deg; p value = 0.000). When biomechanically compared to contralateral intact limbs, the EPC treated limbs had similar torsional stiffness (p=0.996), but significantly lower torsional strength (p=0.000) and smaller angle of twist (p=0.002).
Conclusion: These results suggest that local EPC therapy significantly enhances fracture healing in an animal model. The biomechanical results show that control animals develop a mechanically unstable non-union. In contrast, EPC therapy results in fracture healing that restores the biomechanical properties of the fractured bone closer to that of intact bone.
Correspondence should be addressed to: COA, 4150 Ste. Catherine St. West Suite 360, Westmount, QC H3Z 2Y5, Canada. Email: meetings@canorth.org
