Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

EXPLANT ANALYSIS OF METAL ON METAL (MOM) HIP COMPONENTS RETRIEVED FOLLOWING ADVERSE REACTIONS TO METAL DEBRIS (ARMD)



Abstract

Background: There is a paucity of published data with regard to the wear of failed metal on metal (MoM) resurfacing devices.

Materials and Methods: MoM components retrieved from patients from two independent centres experiencing failure secondary to ARMD were analysed using a Mitutoyo Legex 322 coordinate measuring machine (CMM) which has an accuracy of 0.8 microns. Between 4000 – 6000 points were taken on each explant, dependent on the size of the bearing surface. Maximum wear depths and total volumetric wear were calculated. These values were compared to those from control samples retrieved following uncomplicated fractures/femoral collapse secondary to avascular necrosis (after calculating equivalent yearly wear rates).

Results: 58 ARMD components were analysed. This included 22 36mm MoM THRs (DePuy Pinnacle), 28 DePuy ASRs and 8 Zimmer Duroms. There were 30 resurfacing fracture/avascular necrosis controls. Volumetric wear rates and maximum wear depths of ARMD resurfacing components were significantly greater than the resurfacing control group for both the ASR and Duroms (p< 0.05) however 2 ARMD components exhibited similar amounts of wear compared to controls. Wear rates of the ARMD THR group were significantly lower than the ARMD resurfacing group (p< 0.05).

Conclusions: Increased articular wear is associated with an increased incidence of local adverse effects including tissue necrosis, joint effusions and fractures. However, there are a minority of patients who can develop tissue necrosis in the absence of accelerated wear, implying a spectrum of sensitivity This is reflected in the incidence of ARMD in the patient groups at the main study centre: > 5% in the ASR group and approx 1% in the THR group. We believe this indicates a failure of adequate lubrication and the resultant negative effects in larger bearing devices.

Correspondence should be addressed to: British Hip Society, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE, England. Email: c.wilson@boa.ac.uk