Abstract
Purpose of the study: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the functional and radiographic results of these two surgical techniques using a prospective study.
Material and methods: This study involved two consecutive series of 70 patients with a posterior fracture of the distal radius. Mixed multiple pinning (MMP) consisted in the combination of two styloid pins and two infrafocal dorsal pins. The anterior plate was a locked ITS. The patients decided when it was appropriate to wear a brace postoperatively. Functional assessment used the range of motion, the Quick DASH score, and a self-evaluation of the number of days the brace was worn. Ulnar variance, sagittal and frontal inclination of the radial epiphysis were measured pre- and postoperatively at 45 days.
Results: At mean follow-up of 11.8 months (3–34), the functional outcome was comparable in the two groups but the patients with a plate fixation wore the brace less. Radiographically, there was no loss of final reduction with the plate fixation whereas with the pinning, there was a progressive loss of ulnar variance and less than 2% over-reduction. Major complications (tendon tears, nerve injury) were less frequent with pinning.
Conclusion: Globally, plate fixation enabled more rapid mobilisation of the wrist. Nevertheless this method has its drawbacks (duration of the operation, material availability, cost). In our opinion the mixed multiple pinning method is the treatment of choice for fractures free of major instability or anterior or circumferential comminution.
Correspondence should be addressed to Ghislaine Patte at sofcot@sofcot.fr
