88. HEAD-NECK ANTERIOR OFFSET: AN ESSENTIAL BIOMECHANICAL FACTOR FOR IMPROVING FLEXION AFTER HIP RESURFACING

Abstract

Purpose of the study: Hip resurfacing (HR) is becoming popular again with the advent the the metal-on-metal bearing. This type of surgery is proposed for young, often very active, patients for whom restoration of optimal hip joint range of motion constitutes and important objective. The purpose of this work was to analyse anterior translation of the femoral component to optimise joint range of motion (particularly flexion).

Material and method: From September 2007 to May 2008, 68 hip resurfacing prostheses were implanted in 66 patients aged on average 45 years (range 19–61). All procedures were performed by the same operator using a posterorlateral approach and the same surgical technique. Anterior head-neck offset was a constant objective. The Postel-Merle-d’Aubigné and Harris scores as well as the Devane classification and the WOMAC and the SF-12 were noted. Joint range of motion was noted preoperatively and at last follow-up by and independent operator. Anterior head-neck offset was measured radiographically on the Dunn view using an original technique and calibrated by the Imagika software according to the known diameter of the implants.

Results: All clinical scores as well as the activity level and the subjective scores improved significantly. There were no revisions. The mean anterior head-neck offset was 4.5 mm (range 2–9). Significant correction was observed for gain in postoperative flexion and increased offset (p< 0.005). The group of patients who had an anterior offset considered to be significant (> 4 mm) exhibited significantly better flexion than the group of patients with a small anterior offset.

Discussion: Hip resurfacing has a poor head-neck ratio, depending on the patient’s anatomy, which compares unfavourable with conventional hip prostheses (THA). Nevertheless, the joint range of motion after resurfacing, as observed in our study and in the literature, does not show any decline compared with THA. The greater gain in flexion is an important factor to take into consideration, especially in a young active athletic subject. Each millimetre of gain in anterior offset produces a significant increase in flexion. This offset can be improved by the surgical technique (implanting the femoral component tangentially to the posterior cortical), but also by the design of the resurfacing prosthesis (thick femoral component, increased cement sheath). After hip resurfacing, anterior offset appears to be an essential biomechanical factor for restoration of joint motion.