85. CONTRIBUTION OF EOS 3D RECONSTRUCTION FOR MEASURING LOWER LIMB PARAMETERS

Abstract

Purpose of the study: Leg length discrepancy after THA is a common complication and source of recurrent complaints from patients. To date, no reliable and reproducible technique has come forward to enable accurate quantification of all radiological parameters of the lower limb. Nevertheless, preoperative planning for hip arthroplasty requires knowledge of many limb parameters, in particularly leg length discrepancy, femoral offset, or the head-neck angle. The most widely used method is to use the 2D radiographs. The EOS system uses two digitalised 2D images taken orthogonally in a weight-bearing position to enable 3D reconstruction of the lower limb. The inter- and intraoperator reproducibility has been studied and validated. The purpose of our study was to compare the inter- and intra-operator reproducibilities of the measures taken on the standard full-length x-ray and those determined on the 3D EOS reconstructions.

Material and method: Twenty-five patients scheduled for THA were included in this study (50 lower limbs). Two independent operators determine the measures on the AP EOS view and on the 3D reconstructions obtained from two orthogonal EOS images. The following parameters were measured: femur length, tibia length, limb length, HKA, HKS, femoral offset, neck-shaft angle, head diameter, and length of the femoral neck. Each observer performed two series of measurements. Interobserver reproducibility was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (CI: 95%). Student’s t test was used to compare the clinical parameters measured on the 2D and 3D images.

Results: Inter- and intraobserver reproducibility were 0.867 and 0.903 on the 2D x-rays and 0.911 and 0.940 on the 3D reconstructions. The better reproducibility of the EOS reconstruction was confirmed for all parameters tested in this study. Comparison of the 3D and 2D measurements revealed significant differences.

Discussion: Our study demonstrated that measurements made on EOS 3D reconstructions offer better inter- and intraobserver reproducibility than those made on the standard AP view. In addition, the 3D reconstruction takes into consideration of the projection of the anatomic structures in the plane of the AP radiograph. The EOS appears to be a pertinent tool giving reliable results for the pre- and postoperative work-up for arthroplasty of the lower limb.