Abstract
Purpose of the study: Lengthening can be proposed for children with congenital or acquired short fingers in order to overcome the length defect and improve function, the aesthetic aspect, or enable installation of a hand prosthesis. Three techniques have been proposed. The purpose of this study was to compare the three techniques in terms of lengthening, achieved, cure index, and complication rate.
Material and method: The was a series of 13 lengthening procedures for metacarpals in children with congenital or post-trauma sequelae.
Results: The callotasis method was used for seven children. Slow distraction using a mini-external fixator was applied for progressive lengthening without bone graft. Mean lengthening was 13 mm (range 8–21) for mean a mean cure index of 81 d/cm (range 41.7 to 140.9). There was one major complication: fracture with angulation. The two-phase progressive distraction method with graft was used in four children. The distraction using a mini-external fixator was rapid, followed by second phase bone graft. Mean lengthening was 22 mm (range 13–32) with a cur index of 40.8 d/cm (range 32.8 to 46). There was one fracture of a grafted zone. Single-phase extemporaneous lengthening with immediate graft was used for two children. The intraoperative distraction of the osteotomy was followed immediately by insertion of the graft. Mean lengthening was 9 mm for a cure index of 50 d/cm. One patient required tenolysis of the extensor at six months because of adherences at the graft site.
Discussion: Our results suggest that the two- phase distraction-graft method enables greater lengthening than the callatasis technique for shorter treatment periods but a the cost of a second operation and donor site morbidity. The extemporaneous lengthening method is less ambitious, achieving lengthening to the order of 10 mm, but with a less aggressive procedure.
Correspondence should be addressed to Ghislaine Patte at sofcot@sofcot.fr
