A879. LESSONS LEARNED FROM AN INTRAOPERATIVE COMPARTMENT PRESSURE SENSOR USED TO ASSESS LIGAMENT BALANCE DURING TKA: INFLUENCES ON POSTOPERATIVE KINEMEATICS

Abstract

Recent fluoroscopic analyses evaluating the kinematic function of TKAs have demonstrated significant variability among patients with identical implant designs, suggesting surgical technique also influences function. To help explain these kinematic variations, we used intraoperative compartment pressure sensors to assess balancing at trial reduction and ROM then correlated these intraoperative findings with patients’ postoperative kinematics, assessed using video fluoroscopy.

This study involved 16 patients implanted with a posterior cruciate-sacrificing LCS TKA using a balanced gap technique. After releases in extension, the femur was rotated the appropriate amount to create a rectangular flexion gap relative to the cut tibial surface. As the knee was taken through a ROM from 0–120°, the sensors (placed on the tibial insert trial) dynamically measured the magnitude and location of compartment pressures throughout the ROM. Six to nine months postoperatively, all patients performed successive weight-bearing deep knee bends to maximum flexion under fluoroscopic surveillance. Each patient’s femoro-tibial contact positions and liftoff values were compared to their respective intraoperative compartment pressure findings to establish correlations.

Fluoroscopic results correlated closely with intraoperative compartment pressures and balance data. Three of the 16 patients had condylar liftoff: two patients experienced liftoff in flexion and one in extension (medial). The patient who experienced medial liftoff in extension had decreased medial compartment pressure and a slight valgus malalignment (7° of anatomic alignment). Two of the 13 patients without liftoff had abnormal compartment pressures in extension. In both cases, mechanical axis alignment resulted in loading of the lax compartment with weight-bearing. The other 11 patients had normal compartment pressures in extension and no condylar liftoff. One of these patients had slight valgus (7°) and another slight varus malalignment (4°), but both had normal compartment pressures. Despite good compartment balance, average tibiofemoral rotation was inadequate; three of 16 patients experienced opposite axial rotation with flexion. Extensive ligament release did not always result in equal compartment pressure magnitudes and distributions; compartment balance was influenced by the nature of the release.

These data suggest that liftoff may require both a compartment pressure imbalance and abnormal alignment that together exacerbate the laxity with physiologic loading. Previous kinematic studies of LCS knees have shown that the balanced gap technique produces wellbalanced compartment pressures, resulting in TKAs with little lift-off and very good translational and rotational characteristics. Therefore, while a given implant design may have inherent kinematic tendencies, surgical technique may significantly impact kinematic performance. To optimize implant kinematics and subsequent TKA function and longevity, it may be important for surgeons to accurately balance the flexion and extension gaps. Characteristic compartment pressure patterns and distributions for various ligament releases may shed some light on less than optimal rotational kinematic performance.