A805. LIGAMENT RELEASES DURING TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT DO NOT INCREASE POSTOPERATIVE VARUS-VALGUS LAXITY

Abstract

Instability is a major cause for revision surgery in total knee replacement (TKR). With a balanced gap technique, the ligaments are theoretically balanced. However, there is concern that ligament releases needed to align the leg may cause instability. Furthermore, no information is available about the relationship between the amount of varus-valgus laxity directly after implantation and at a later postoperative interval. This prospective clinical study investigated whether ligament releases necessary during total knee replacement (TKR) led to a higher varus-valgus laxity during peroperative examination and after 6 months.

In this prospective cohort study, in 49 patients a primary TKR was implanted using a balanced gap technique. Varus and valgus laxity of the knee was assessed in extension and flexion (70 degrees) per-operative (before and after implant) with a navigation system and post-operative with standardised stress radiographs (both methods 15 Nm stress applied).

Knees were catalogued according to ligament releases performed during surgery: no releases, lateral releases, medial releases with posteromedial condyle (PMC), and medial releases with superficial medial collateral ligament (SMCL). ANOVA was used to test between release groups.

At surgery, before and after implantation of the prosthesis, there was no difference in varus or valgus laxity in extension and flexion between knees that did not need a ligament release (n=22), knees with lateral release (n=5), knees with medial SMCL releases (n=15) and knees with medial PMC releases (n=7). Six months after TKR, varus or valgus laxity in extension and flexion was not significantly different between the release categories.

In conclusion, ligament releases of the SMCL, PMC, and lateral structures performed during a balanced gap technique in TKR do not lead to an increased varus-valgus laxity in extension and flexion at 6 months after surgery. Therefore, routine releases of these structures to achieve neutral leg alignment can safely be performed without causing increased varus-valgus laxity. The results of this study suggest that the reported high incidence of revisions for ligament instability after TKR is not likely to be caused by routine ligament releases when a balanced gap technique is used. Apparently, there is not a ligament instability problem as long as the gaps are properly filled with prosthesis components. We believe that the conclusion of this study would also be valid when bone referenced techniques are applied instead of tensors, as long as the gaps created are balanced.