Abstract
Placement of total knee arthroplasty components is typically controlled via resections that reference bony landmarks. For example, external rotation of the femoral component can be pre-determined by referencing the posterior condyles or the epicondylar axis. Such approaches exclude consideration of any potential effect of the collateral ligaments before resection are made. In addition, bone referencing instrumentation usually limits femoral component placement to discrete values of external rotation such as 3° or 5°. The purpose of the present study was to determine external rotation of the femoral component following use of a novel ligament balancing approach and to assess the accuracy of balancing the flexion and extension gaps with this ligament balancing system.
One hundred twenty knees in 110 patients were consecutively enrolled by a single surgeon using the same implant across subjects. All patients underwent arthroplasty that set external rotation of the femoral component based upon use of a novel ligament balancing system. Following ligament tensioning/balancing, the femur was prepared.
Thicknesses of the medial and lateral posterior condylar resections were measured and the difference between the two measurements was calculated. When placed into relation with the line formed by the distance between the midpoints of the distal condyles (reference line), the difference in the condylar resections gives the height of a right triangle. The arc tangent function was then used to calculate the resultant angle (external rotation) formed from the reference line and the hypotenuse. The average, range and standard deviation of the external rotation values was found.
External rotation averaged 6.9° (+/−2.8°) and ranged from 0.6° to 12.8°. Fifty-four percent of femoral components were sized 3, 4 or 5. The external rotation values in this study were 4° and 2° larger, respectively, than the typical 3° and 5° discrete values that are common to measured resection systems.
External rotation values are higher on average, when ligament tensioning/balancing is employed with this novel system compared to measured resection systems. Also, the standard deviation and range suggests that true femoral rotation varies greatly between patients. This finding suggests that limiting the surgeon to discrete rotation values may be at odds with where the femur “desires” to be, given soft tissue considerations for each patient. Future work includes determining whether there is a functional difference between measured resection and this ligament tensioning/balancing approach.
The accuracy of the ligament balancing system was assessed by applying equal tension on the ligaments using a tensioning bolt and torque wrench in flexion and extension after the bone resections had been made. The resulting flexion and extension gaps were then measured to determine rectangular shape and equality of the gaps.
Rectangular flexion and extension gaps were obtained within 0.5 mm in all cases.
Equality of the flexion and extension gaps was also obtained within 0.5 mm 100% of the time. To the best of our knowledge, this system and technique has produced better accuracy balancing the flexion and extension gaps in total knee arthroplasty than has previous been reported.
Correspondence should be addressed to Diane Przepiorski at ISTA, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. Phone: +1 916-454-9884; Fax: +1 916-454-9882; E-mail: ista@pacbell.net
