Abstract
Using a larger diameter femoral head in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has advantages in terms of the increased joint stability and range of motion. And the wear resistance of highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) even combined with a larger head has already been demonstrated by in vitro studies. The purpose of this study was to compare the in vivo wear of Longevity HXLPE sockets against 32 mm and 26 mm heads at a 5-year follow-up.
From November 2000 to November 2001, 51 primary cementless THAs were performed with a 26 mm cobalt-chromium head and a Longevity HXLPE socket (Zimmer). A cohort of 32 mm cobalt-chromium heads was comprised of 51 THAs with the same prosthesis performed from December 2001 to December 2003. No significant differences between the groups were observed in gender, age, and BMI, however, polyethylene liners with 32 mm heads were significantly thinner than those with 26 mm heads. Two-dimensional linear wear was measured using PolyWare software on annual x-rays, and total head penetration rates at postoperative 5-year and steady state wear rates were calculated. In addition, periprosthetic osteolysis was evaluated.
At the 5-year follow-up, the total head penetration rates were 0.047±0.022 mm/year with 26 mm heads and 0.048±0.026 mm/year with 32 mm heads. The steady state wear rates were −0.008 mm/year with 26 mm heads and 0.001 mm/year with 32 mm heads. No significant differences were seen between the two groups (p=0.82 and p=0.24). Osteolysis was not observed around pros-theses in any hips.
At the 5-year follow-up, the wear rate of Longevity HXLPE was very low. A Longevity HXLPE socket will undergo the same level of wear whether with a 32 mm head or a 26 mm head.
Correspondence should be addressed to Diane Przepiorski at ISTA, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. Phone: +1 916-454-9884; Fax: +1 916-454-9882; E-mail: ista@pacbell.net