Abstract
With the boom in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and hard-on-hard total hip replacements (THRs) with extremely low wear, accurate tribological measurements become difficult. Characterizing THR friction can help in this, especially if the progress of such friction can be tracked during wear tests. Friction measurement can also be used as a tool to study the effects of acetabular-liner deformation during insertion, and possible femoral head “clamping”. This study presents estimates of friction during extended wear testing on THRs of the same size but with different material combinations, using a technique (previously introduced) based on equilibrium of forces and moments measured in the simulator.
All tests were based on five million cycles (Mc) and samples of size-44mm (head diameter). Samples included 6 metal-on-UHMWPE (MOP) (3 with conventional UHMWPE and 3 with highly-cross-linked (HXL) UHWMPE liners), 6 metal-on-metal (MOM) (3 TiN-coated and 3 uncoated), 6 MOM resurfacing (3 standard and 3 with small pockets for lubrication transport), and 3 ceramic-on-UHMWPE (COP) THRs (MOM resurfacing and COPs for 2Mc only). All were lubricated with diluted bovine serum with 20g/l protein concentration at 37°C, and subjected to the loading and rotations of the walking cycle in ISO-14242-1 on a twelve-station hip simulator (AMTI, Boston).
The conventional and HXL MOPs had steady friction factors of 0.045±0.009 and 0.046±0.003 over 5Mc, explained by the stability of wear rates of both these MOP types (72.0±2.81mg/Mc and 14.2±3.57mg/Mc, respectively). However, during the “bedding-in” period (first 0.5Mc), the conventional MOP friction factor rose from 0.047±0.004 to 0.057±0.004 while high wear was occurring (147.1±10.08mg/Mc). The TiN-coated and uncoated MOMs displayed initial friction factors of 0.124±0.117 and 0.039±0.003 respectively. The high standard deviation for the coated THRs was due to coating removal on one specimen which caused scratches and scuffs on its articulating surfaces. This specimen had a friction factor of 0.260 at 0.028Mc. By 1Mc, the TiN coating wore away on the other two coated specimens (friction factors at 1Mc: coated 0.081±0.036, uncoated 0.050±0.014). Over the 5Mc test, average friction factors for the coated and uncoated THRs were 0.097±0.020 and 0.049±0.014 respectively. The 44mm standard and “pocketed” MOM resurfacing THRs displayed initial friction factors of 0.038±0.009 and 0.059±0.026 respectively that increased to the same level at 2Mc (0.094±0.020 and 0.094±0.029, respectively). No difference in wear was detected between the two resurfacing head types (wear rates over 2Mc: standard 3.32±0.25mg/ Mc, pocketed 2.22±1.76mg/Mc), but curiously, both types exhibited an equal level of scratching and scuffing on their articular surface. Finally, the three COP THRs exhibited high liner wear over 2Mc (97.44±3.08mg/Mc), which slowed after the “bedding-in” period. The friction factor also decreased from 0.091±0.005 to 0.070±0.008 over the same period as the UHMWPE liner conformed to the ceramic head.
The method utilized here facilitates on-line sampling throughout the progress of a prolonged wear test, and therefore allows predictions on THR performance/wear to be made. When high friction factors were observed, a high wear rate was occurring and measured on the THR specimens, or damage to articulating surfaces was seen.
Correspondence should be addressed to Diane Przepiorski at ISTA, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. Phone: +1 916-454-9884; Fax: +1 916-454-9882; E-mail: ista@pacbell.net
