Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) in the region of the lumbar spine is a significant problem among individuals, and efforts focused on treating both the symptoms and causes of LBP have proven to be difficult. Aside from conservative treatments, the predominant surgical approach for treating degenerative spine conditions has been to fuse the vertebral bodies at the symptomatic level. Even today, surgical fusion and its effect on adjacent levels are still not fully understood. Therefore, the objective of this study was to use fluoroscopy and mathematical modeling techniques to identify the in vivo kinematics and kinetics in subjects having either a normal, degenerative or fused condition of the lumbar spine.
Twenty-five subjects (ten normal, ten degenerative, and five fusion) were evaluated under fluoroscopic surveillance while performing flexion/extension of the lumbar spine. Subjects within the normal and degenerative groups were analyzed only once, while subjects from the fusion group were analyzed both pre-operatively and at a minimum of six months post-operative. The fusion group consisted of three subjects symptomatic at L4/L5, with the remaining two subjects symptomatic at L5/S1. In vivo kinematics data were derived using a 3D-to-2D model fitting algorithm and served as input into a 3D mathematical model of the lumbar spine. The parametric, inverse dynamics mathematical model was created to allow for the determination of the bearing surface contact and muscle forces at each level of the lumbar spine.
Three-dimensional kinematics analyses revealed that subjects classified as having a normal lumbar spine experienced a more uniform motion pattern compared to those observed in the degenerative and fusion groups. Alternatively, the degenerative and fusion subjects demonstrated a more coupled motion pattern in order to perform in plane flexion/extension. Compared to the normal group, rotations in the sagital plane decreased by an average of 28% at the pathological level in the degenerative group, while in the fusion group segmental motions slightly increased at the adjacent levels. Results from the mathematical model also revealed higher out-of-plane forces and increased loading at symptomatic and adjacent levels in both the degenerative and fused groups compared to forces observed in the normal spine.
The abnormal motion patterns, which result from decreased or loss of motion at pathological levels in the degenerative and fusion groups, are believed to result in higher resultant forces in the spine. This may be subjecting the intervertebral discs to increased stresses, and as a consequence may be linked to more rapid degeneration at levels where the abnormal kinematics are occurring.
Correspondence should be addressed to Diane Przepiorski at ISTA, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. Phone: +1 916-454-9884; Fax: +1 916-454-9882; E-mail: ista@pacbell.net