Abstract
Controversy still exists in the literature regarding efficacy and usefulness of CASN in knee arthroplasty. However, obsession with basic alignments and proper correction of mechanical axes fails to recognise the full future potential of CASN which seems to lie in enhanced dynamic assessment. Basic dynamics usually at least includes intraoperative assessment of limb alignments, flexion-extension gap balancing and simple testing through ranges of motion. However our upgraded CASN system (Brainlab) is also capable of enhanced assessment not only including the provision of data on initial to final alignments but also contact point observations. The system can also perform an enhanced ‘Range Of Motion’ (ROM) analysis including observation of epicondylar axis motion, valgus and varus, antero-posterior shifts as well as flexion and extension gaps. Tracking values for both tibiofemoral and patellofemoral motion have also been obtained after performing registration of the prosthetic trochlea.
Observations were then made using a set of standardised dynamic tests. Firstly, the lower leg was placed in neutral alignment and the knee put through a flexionextension cycle. Secondly the test was repeated but with the lower leg being placed into varus and internal rotation. The third test was performed with the lower leg in valgus and external rotation.
We have been able to carry out these observations in a limited case series of 15 total knee arthroplasties and have found it possible to observe and quantify marked intra-operative variation in the stability characteristics of the implanted joints before corrections have been made and final assessments performed. Indeed contact point observation has found several cases of edge loading before corrections have been made. Also ROM analysis has demonstrated the ability of the system in other cases to observe and then make necessary adjustments of implant positions and ligament balance which alter the amounts of antero-posterior and lateral translations. In this way paradoxical antero-posterior and larger rotational movements have been minimised. Cases where conversion to posterior stabilisation has been necessary have been encountered. Also patellar tracking has been observed during such dynamic tests and appropriate adjustments made to components and soft tissue balancing.
Although numbers in this case series are small, it has been possible to begin to observe, classify and quantify patterns of instability intra-operatively using simple stress tests. Such enhanced intra-operative information may in future make it possible to create algorithms for logical adjustments to ligament balance, component sizes, types and positions. In this way CASN becomes a more useful tool.
Correspondence should be addressed to Diane Przepiorski at ISTA, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. Phone: +1 916-454-9884; Fax: +1 916-454-9882; E-mail: ista@pacbell.net
