Abstract
This study aims to compare the gait pattern of patients operated with a TKA versus a normal population in order to evaluate if the excellent function of TKA reported in the literature corresponds to objectively measured parameters.
20 patients operated of TKA with a follow up > 1 year, all patients rated with a very good functional result (Knee Society Knee score > 85/100 – VAS < = 1/10) were compared with a group of 20 “ normal” persons.
The study was blind: the examiner did not know whether the person was a normal, or which knee was operated.
The test consisted in an 11 meters walk, on an AMTI force platform; the movements of the body were recorded with 6 IR cameras and analysed with the “Motion Analysis” software.
The implant was a mobile bearing AP stabilised knee.
The measured parameters were kinematic : speed, step length, flexion angle, duration of stance /WB phase and dynamic : flexion/extension, varus/valgus, internal/ external moments and resultant force direction. When matched with age and BMI, all kinematic parameters of the TKA group are equal to that of the normals.
However, dynamic parameters differ significantly between both groups: At the end of stance phase and heel strike the operated patients have a lack of extension of 10° despite a clinical measurement of full extension (0°) In the frontal plane, all patients exhibited a valgus walking pattern but the mechanical axis measured on long standing radiographs was 180°+/−1°. In the horizontal plane, all operated patients had an external rotation of +8° compared to the normals.
Despite excellent clinical scores and radiologic positioning, gait analysis demonstrates important dynamic differences between the TKA and the normal group. The extension lag at heel strike may be related to either quad weakness, or an insufficient extension gap at surgery; The valgus resultant pattern occurs despite a perfect alignment of the mechanical axis (180°) on the operated patients: this rises the question whether this alignment is the goal or if an undercorrection would be more physiologic. External rotation is superior to the normal group : it is in relation with the external rotation of the femoral and tibial components.
Conclusion. Gait analysis of the TKA group of patients compared to normal demonstrates important dynamic differences in relation with the surgical positioning of the implant.
Correspondence should be addressed to Diane Przepiorski at ISTA, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. Phone: +1 916-454-9884; Fax: +1 916-454-9882; E-mail: ista@pacbell.net
