Abstract
Stability in TKR is provided by the prosthesis design, weight bearing, alignment and soft tissue envelope which triggers proprioception and neuromuscular control. For long survivorship, the least constrained design are prefered whenever possible. Today there is a discussion about the best prosthetic femoro-tibial alignment as discussed widely in Europe and more recently by Pagnano.
Total knee replacements must be very stable to improve the function and the wear. We certainly performed too many releases in the past and misunderstood some of the fine tuning between posterior structures and collateral ligament frame. Technique in release tends to be more elaborated in order to address sequentially primary and secundary restraints. Release of the lateral structures often created excessive laxity in the past and can be addressed with translocation of the ligaments insertions.
In case of elongated collateral structures, preserving the posterior cruciate and reconstruction of the collateral ligament allows use of less constrained prosthesis.
In revision arthroplasty, the condition may be even more complex but usually the collateral ligaments may be identified. It is usually possible to find and reconstruct their insertions especially on the femoral side. Sometimes, augmentation will be needed but at the end, there is a good functional collateral ligament frame.
Deformities with different soft tissues conditions and with extraarticular components in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty will be reported in severe varus, valgus and stiff knees.
Correspondence should be addressed to Diane Przepiorski at ISTA, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. Phone: +1 916-454-9884; Fax: +1 916-454-9882; E-mail: ista@pacbell.net
