Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

METAL PROXIMAL RADIUS ENDOPROSTHESES: THE STANMORE EXPERIENCE



Abstract

Introduction: There is limited literature available on the use of metal prosthetic replacements for the treatment of non-traumatic lesions of the proximal radius. This study is a medium-term follow-up of implant survivor-ship and the functional outcome following insertion of metal proximal radius endoprostheses performed at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital.

Method: We present a series of six patients treated with endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal radius following resection of non-traumatic pathologies. The patients included four females and two males, with a mean age of 39 years at the time of surgery. Their diagnoses included Ewing’s sarcoma, chondroblastoma, benign fibrous histiocytoma, radio-ulna synostosis and renal carcinoma metastases in two patients. Follow-up extended to 192 months with a mean of 76 months.

Results: During this time there were no complications with the prostheses, the most recent radiographs demonstrated secure fixation of the implants and none required revision. One patient developed posterior interosseuous nerve neuropraxia following surgery, which partially recovered, and another patient passed away as a result of disseminated metastatic renal cell carcinoma which was present pre-operatively. The patient with radio-ulna synostosis had a 25° fixed flexion deformity of the elbow post-operatively but good flexion, supination and pro-nation. All other patients had full ranges of movement at the elbow. Functional scores were assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score with patients achieving a mean score of 86 (65 – 100) out of 100.

Discussion: The results of the use of proximal radial endoprostheses for treatment of non-traumatic lesions are encouraging with regards to survivorship of the implant and functional outcome of the elbow.

Correspondence should be addressed to BOOS at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE, England.