Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

COMPLICATIONS OF ANKLE SYNDESMOSIS STABILISATION USING A TIGHTROPE



Abstract

Stabilisation of the ankle syndesmosis remains a topic of debate regarding the best method of fixation; the most recent development is the ankle tightrope - a tensionable fibrewire suture. Despite over thirty thousand successful surgeries(1) reported, evidence supporting its use remains extremely limited. The aim of our study was to identify complications arising after insertion of this device for syndesmotic instability.

All patients undergoing tightrope stabilisation of the ankle syndesmosis in Aberdeen Royal Infirmary between January 2006 and February 2009 inclusive were incorporated in our study. Patient identifier data was collated at the time of operation by a research nurse with case records collected and analysed by the authors at the end of the study period. Nineteen cases were identified with one subsequently excluded due to death. Of the remaining patients thirteen were male and five female. Age ranged from sixteen to fifty-eight years. Five patients required tightrope fixation alone, the remainder necessitating bony fixation according to AO recommendations. Time in cast immobilisation ranged from five to eight weeks, time to full weight bearing six to ten weeks and time to discharge eight weeks to fifteen months.

In this series, 22% of tightropes were removed secondary to wound breakdown or knot prominence. Other complications included syndesmotic widening(11%), knot prominence without removal(5.5%) and synostosis(5.5%).

Incontrast to previously published literature (2,3,4,5,6) this, the second largest series to date, demonstrates a high complication rate(44%) - perhaps the tightrope is not as advantageous as initially thought.

Correspondence should be addressed to Professor Hamish Simpson at hamish.simpson@ed.ac.uk