EXPOSURE AND EXPERIENCE IN TRAUMA SURGERY – PERCEPTIONS OF UNITED KINGDOM ORTHOPAEDIC TRAINEES

Abstract

Anecdotal concern exists over the ability of current UK trainees to manage complex orthopaedic trauma.

A 15 item web-based survey sent to a sample of orthopaedic trainees. Power calculations deemed 222 responses from 888 trainees necessary to achieve a 5% error rate with 90% confidence limits.

232 responses were received. For cases involving external fixation or intramedullary nailing, perceived confidence and training adequacy was high despite infrequent exposure. Perceived confidence and adequacy of training in complex trauma is significantly lower. Less than 20% of trainees have full confidence in their ability to debride and stabilize mutilating hand injuries. 35% of trainees lack confidence in their assessment of limb viability and 56% lack confidence in amputation for extremity trauma. 71% of trainees are not confident in the management of junctional trauma and 68% regard their training in this field as inadequate. With regard to advanced resuscitation using novel blood product combinations; 65% of trainees are lacking confidence and 44% perceive their training as inadequate. For simple fracture stabilisation, vacuum dressings, antibiotic pro-phylaxis and fasciotomy, trainee perceived confidence increased with time in training. This increase did not occur in more complex trauma cases.

Perceived confidence amongst orthopaedic trainees in the management of routine extremity trauma is high despite limited exposure and concerns over changes in surgical training. This is in marked contrast to that reported in complex trauma. For military trainees, the value of supervised training on military deployment to gain experience in such cases is now apparent.