PHILOS PLATE FOR HUMERAL FRACTURES – EXPERIENCE OF FIRST 70 CASES

Abstract

Our aim was to analyse radiological outcome of proximal humerus fractures treated with Philos plate and to assess its usefulness in treatment of malunion and non-union.

Seventy-seven patients were treated with Philos plate (24 men and 53 women). Mean age was 61 years (15–88). There were 66 acute fractures, 6 nonunion, 4 mal-union and one periprosthetic fracture. Acute fractures included 29 two part, 30 three part and five 4 part fractures. Seven had associated dislocation. There were two head splitting fractures. Deltopectoral approach was used in all. No acute fractures were bonegrafted however all nonunions had bonegraft.

Postoperative radiographs were available for review for 59. Average union time was 12 weeks (8–24). Satisfactory union occurred in 51 (86.4%). Twenty-three (39 %) fractures had inadequate reduction. Malplacement of plate was observed in 25 (42%) leading to significant malunion in 11.8%. Satisfactory union was occurred in all of last 30 patients. Nonunion occurred in 2 with infection in one. Other complications included screw penetration into glenohumeral joint, avascular necrosis, screw backing out and tuberosity detachment. Philos plate fixation was used for treatment of 6 nonunions, 4 malunions and one periprosthetic fracture with satisfactory outcome in all.

Relatively high rate of complications was observed in early cases in this series. This could be attributed to the steep learning curve with this technique. Emphasis should be put on careful and adequate reduction of fracture and optimal placement of plate (about 8 mm from the tip of tuberosity) to avoid impingement and to achieve correct screw placement in the humeral head.

In conclusion, Philos plate has been of benefit in management of complex fractures as well as management of non-union of proximal humerus. Quality of reduction and optimal placement of plate appear to be the two most important parameters for a successful outcome.