Abstract
The St Leger total knee replacement is a bicondylar prosthesis developed as a cheaper alternative to other similar implants of its time. Between October 1993 and June 1999, 144 St Leger total knee replacements were implanted in 114 patients. The aim of this study was to clinically and radiologically assess these patients after a mean follow up of 10.22 years.
Between February and July 2007 ninety-one patients recalled for clinical evaluation (using functional and objective Knee Society Scores) and radiological assessment (using the Knee Society Scoring System). 11 patients had died and 12 were lost to follow up or were medically unfit to attend evaluation. Of the ninety-one patients recalled, 18 had had their prostheses revised (19 knees). 63% of prostheses had survived 10 years or more.
Of the patients with St Leger knees in situ (99 knees) the American Knee Scores showed 78% poor, 10% fair, 6% good and 6% excellent results. Radiological assessment identified 12 arthroplasties that had failed (5 femoral components, 5 tibial components and 4 patellae,) 58 that needed close follow up (18 femoral components, 31 tibial components and 38 patellae) and 29 that were well fixed. A best-case Kaplan-Meier cumulative survivorship was 87% at 10 years. (Worst-case was 71% at 10 years)
These 10 year results showed that the St Leger total knee prosthesis did not perform as well as other bicondylar prostheses of the same generation and had a higher revision rate. Despite favourable published mid-term results, the long-term results for the St Leger total knee replacement have shown it to be unreliable and not worth the initial financial saving.
Correspondence should be addressed to Editorial Secretary Mr ML Costa or Assistant Editorial Secretary Mr B.J. Ollivere at BOA, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE, England; Email: mattcosta@hotmail.com or ben@ollivere.co.uk
