KNEE OUTCOME SCORES – DO WE GET PEOPLE BACK TO NORMAL?

Abstract

We aim to create a set of reference data of commonly used scoring systems in the normal population, and to compare these results with published postoperative scores for commonly performed knee operations. This was a questionnaire-based study and a total of 744 questionnaires were sent out, of which 494 replies were received. Six scoring systems were addressed: Lysholm and Oxford Knee Scores, Tegner and UCLA activity scales and Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) for both pain and function. Data was collected into groups based on age (20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79, 80–89 years). The reference data obtained was then compared to published postoperative scores for knee arthroplasty and ACL reconstruction, to assess whether these patients did indeed return to “normal”.

The mean scores for sequential age groups (described above) were as follows: Oxford Knee Score – 13, 13, 14, 14, 17, 15, 17; Lysholm Knee Score – 96, 95, 92, 89, 89, 89, 79; Tegener Activity Scale – 6, 5, 5, 4, 4, 3, 3; UCLA Activity Scale – 8, 7, 7, 7, 6, 6, 5; VAS pain – 5, 8, 10, 9, 14, 12, 20; VAS function 96, 95, 90, 90, 86, 84, 84. Symptom based scoring systems (Oxford Knee Score, Lysholm) were independent of age whereas activity scores (Tegner, UCLA) decreased with age. There was no significant difference detected between scores in different sexes in the same age group. Compared to published scores in an age-matched population following TKR, the data obtained showed that patients do not return to normal scores following arthroplasty. Following ACL reconstructive surgery, activity scores were higher than compared to the data obtained from our population.

Data generated from this study can be used as reference data and can play an important role in interpreting post-intervention scores following knee surgery.