Abstract
Introduction: Papers about high-virulence infections are not usual, results contradictory, and orthopaedic outcomes not described.
Purpose: to compare infectious and orthopaedic results after late arthroplasty infections by single vs. polymicrobial isolates, low vs. high-virulence, and Gram-positive vs. Gram-negative organisms, when treated by exchange surgery plus long cycles of combined oral antibiotics.
Patients and Methods: A late arthroplasty infection was diagnosed in 68 consecutive patients (48 female) of 72.2(+/−10.2) years (37 hips/31 knees).
Cultures were polymicrobial in 22 cases and by Gram-positive in 55 (80.9%). Highly-resistant organisms: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus (36 patients) and ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (2 patients). “Problematic-treatment”: Enterococcus (6 patients), Pseudomonas (3 patients), non-fermenting Gram-negative (2), moulds (1).
Oral antibiotic selection: according to bacterial sensitivity, biofilm and intracellular effectiveness. Protocolized surgery: two-stage exchange. Average follow-up: 4.7+/−2.7 years (1–11).
Healing of infection is diagnosed if absence of clinical, serological and radiological signs of infection during the whole follow-up. Orthopaedic outcome is evaluated by HHS for hips and by KSCRS for knees.
Results: Surgery was not possible in 7 infections (rejected by patients), and reimplantation in 17 additional cases (patients died shortly after first surgery, rejected 2nd surgery, or was contraindicated because of medical reasons).
Healing of infection: 59/68 patients (86.8%), 32/37 hips (86.5%) and 27/31 knees (87.1%). Infection not healed: 7/68 cases (10.3%) (4/37 hips, 3/31 knees) (5 by highly-resistant and 1 by “problematic-treatment” bacteria). There are no differences between hips and knees (p=0.55).
Orthopaedic Results: HHS averages 80.5+/−16.2 (81+/−16 in healed infection, 56+/−23.5 in persistent infection). KSCRS averages 77.2/58.1 +/− 19.8/24.5 in healed infections, 32.6/0+/−25.8/0 in persistent infections. Infective and orthopaedic results present a strong statistical correlation in hips (p=0.016) and knees (p=0.0001).
Statistically significant differences are not found when comparing subgroups according to Gram stain (p=0.43), multiple vs single bacteria (p=0.47 infective, p=0.71 orthopaedic), highly-resistant bacteria (p=0.2 infective, p=0.1/0.5 orthopaedic), or “problematic-treatment” (p=0.68).
Conclusions:
-
A strong statistical correlation appears between infective and orthopedic results after late arthroplasty infections.
-
With the number of cases presented significant differences in infective or in orthopaedic results are not found when comparing single vs. polymicrobial, gram-negative vs. gram-positive, high vs. low antimicrobial resistance and “problematic-treatment” infections.
Correspondence should be addressed to: EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH – 8005 Zürich, Switzerland. Email: office@efort.org