ASSOCIATION BETWEEN CLINICAL ASSESSMENT AND GAIT PARAMETRES IN SURGICALLY TREATED IDIOPATHIC CLUBFOOT

Abstract

Aim: This study was designed to investigate the association between clinical assessment International Clubfoot Study Group (ICFSG) and quantitative gait data of the children

Methods: Nineteen patients with 30 surgically treated clubfoot were included in this study. Bilateral involvement was present in 11. Average age was 9 years (range 6–14 years) at the time of last follow-up. Patients were treated with different surgical techniques at early childhood period. At the final follow-up they were evaluated according to ICFSG clinical scale. This rating system is based on three main subgroups of evaluation as morphologic evaluation, functional evaluation and radiological evaluation. The maximum score is 12 in morphologic evaluation, 36 in functional evaluation and 12 in radiological evaluation. The total score is from 0 for a perfect result to 60 for the worst result. Further, a total score of 0–5 is rated as excellent, 6–15 as good, 16–30 as fair and over 30 as poor. Quantitative gait data was collected with the Vicon 370 (Oxford Metrics, Oxford, UK). Two force plates (Bertec, Colombus, Ohio, USA) were used for kinetic analysis. All time-distance (walking velocity, cadence, step time, step length, double support time), kinematic (joint rotation angles of pelvis, hip, knee and ankle in sagittal, coronal and transverse planes) and kinetic (ground reaction forces, moments and powers of hip, knee and ankle) data were processed using Vicon Clinical Manager software package. Spearman correlation analysis was used to evaluate if there is a correlation between total clinical score and gait parameters.

Results: Average ICSG score was 8.63 (range 1–29). Outcome was excellent in 16, good in 8 and fair in 6 patients according to ICSG. There was a significant correlation between total ICSG score and walking velocity (rs=−0.195, p=0.004), step length (rs=−0.476, p=0.019), pelvic excursion in sagittal plane (rs=−0.429, p=0.026), hip excursion in sagittal plane (rs=−0.511, p=0.006), knee excursion in sagittal plane (rs=−0.486, p=0.019), Ankle excursion in sagital plane (rs=−0.413, p=0.040), peak ankle plantar flexion moment (rs=−0.600, p=0.039), peak ankle plantar flexion power (rs=−0.487, p=0.025). When we compare the gait parameters between groups only foot progression angle showed a significant difference (p=0.031).

Conclusion: ICFSG score is a successful method to follow outcome in patients with surgically treated clubfoot. ICFSG score is correlated with many kinematic and kinetic gait data however foot progression angle is the only parameter predicting outcome in children with surgically treated idiopathic clubfoot. Quantitative gait analysis may help to define the liable factors of the functional deficits, and to prescribe novel rehabilitation techniques to enable better outcome for children with clubfeet.