Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

DOES THE USE OF DYNAMIC 3D RECONSTRUCTION CTS IMPROVE PREOPERATIVE PLANNING FOR ACETABULAR FRACTURES?



Abstract

Detailed preoperative planning is essential for open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures if a successful outcome is to be achieved. Decisions such as patient positioning, approach, reduction techniques and implant positioning are greatly influenced by fracture pattern and displacement. These fractures are frequently complex and a thorough understanding of their 3-Dimensional (3D) form is necessary for pre-operative decision making.

A combination of biplanar x-rays, 2 Dimensional CT scans (Axial, Sagittal and Coronal multi-plane reformats) and, more recently, 3D CT reconstructions are provided routinely.

However, the 3D reconstructions are provided to surgeons as static 2D pictures of the 3D model (up to 6 different views), rather than a true 3D representation.

In this study we used dynamic 3D models to provide additional information to surgeons. The 3D models were generated on a standard desktop or laptop computer and can be used in the operating theatre (Osirix Dicom viewing software). These true 3D reconstructions allow the surgeon to manipulate the model himself in real time so that the fracture can be viewed at any angle and overlying fragments removed to expose deeper structures.

3 experienced consultant pelvic trauma surgeons reviewed plain radiographs and 2D Pelvic CT scans from 20 acetabular fractures. They were asked to make a preoperative plan with regard to fracture classification and planned surgical approach(s). At separate, time-spaced, sittings they were provided with a 3D Static and 3D Dynamic CT reconstruction in addition. They were blinded to any previous plan and the patients’ details.

A comparison was then made with regard to surgical plan and the time taken to make that plan with or without access to dynamic 3D models. The additional information provided by dynamic 3D modelling was found to reduce planning time and, in some cases, change the surgical plan.

Correspondence should be addressed to: EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH – 8005 Zürich, Switzerland. Email: office@efort.org