THE VALUE OF PLAIN RADIOGRAPHS IN DETERMINING THE PROGRESSION IN SIZE OF PERIACETABULAR OSTEOLYTIC LESIONS

Abstract

While computed tomography (CT) provides an accurate measure of osteolysis volume, it would be advantageous in general clinical practice if plain radiographs could be used to monitor osteolysis. This study determined the ability of plain radiographs to detect the presence of and determine the progression in size of osteolytic lesions around cementless acetabular components.

Nineteen acetabular components were diagnosed with osteolysis using a high-resolution multi-slice CT scanner with metal artefact suppression. Mean duration since arthroplasty was 14 years (range 10–15 years) at initial CT. Repeat CT scans were undertaken over a five year period to determine osteolysis progression. On anteroposterior pelvis (AP) radiographs and oblique radiographs of the acetabulum seen on the rolled lateral hip view, which were taken at the same time as the CT scans, area of osteolysis was measured manually correcting for magnification.

Osteolysis was detected on the AP radiographs in 8 of 19 hips (42%), on the oblique radiographs in 6 of 19 hips (32%) and on the combined AP and oblique radiographs in 8 of 19 hips (42%). Throughout the study period, osteolysis was detected on 31 of 76 AP radiographs (41%) and 22 of 75 oblique radiographs (29%). Osteolysis was more likely to be detected on plain radiographs if the lesion volume was greater than 10cm3 in size (p=0.005). On CT, osteolysis progressed by more than 1cm3/yr in 10 of 19 hips (55%). In these ten hips, osteolysis progression was detected on AP radiographs in six hips and on oblique radiographs in three hips. No correlation was found between osteolysis progression measured by CT and that measured on AP (r2=0.16, p=0.37) or oblique (r2=0.37, p=0.15) or AP and oblique radiographs (r2=0.34, p=0.17).

Plain radiographs are poor in monitoring progression in size of periacetabular osteolytic lesions. Plain radiographs may detect lesions more than 10cm3 in size, but are unreliable.