Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

OUTCOME OF 263 RESURFACING HIP ARTHROPLASTIES. A SINGLE SURGEON SERIES WITH A MEAN FOLLOW UP OF 2.0 YEARS



Abstract

Sectioned femoral components retrieved from failed hip resurfacing arthroplasties show resorption of proximal femoral bone or formation of a fibrous membrane at the bone cement interface. We hypothesize that both scenarios create a functional discontinuity zone (FDZ), which exacerbates off-loading the proximal bone and promoting resorption. Our study uses Finite Element (FE) modeling to examine the effects of the presence of an FDZ on bone remodeling following hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A radiographic analysis of the proximal femur following hip resurfacing was conducted in order to draw a comparison to clinical findings

The hip resurfacing FE models were oriented in variable angles and a low-modulus (2 MPa) FDZ was simulated beneath the implant head. Femoral joint and muscle loads were applied. Interface stress was compared for the normal and simulated FDZ resurfaced femurs. Bone remodeling stimuli was determined using changes in strain energy. A range of implant orientations were compared to study the affect on bone remodelling. A retrospective radiological analysis was undertaken on 100 hips with a minimum of 5 years follow up. Measurements of femoral neck diameter at 2 and 5 years were undertaken.

The presence of the simulated FDZ in the FE analysis resulted in increased proximal-medial bone resorption and slightly greater bone formation surrounding the stem. Correspondingly, device-bone interface stresses were found to decrease proximally under the loading platform and increase at the stem, particularly adjacent to the stem-head junction. Valgus orientation showed increased resorption underneath the shell. Varus orientation showed increased bone formation at the stem tip. The radiological analysis identified 2 distinct patterns of neck thinning. Slow thinners (76%) had less than 5% reduction in neck diameter at 2 years and less than 10% at 5 years. Rapid thinner (24%) had more than 5% thinning at 2 years and more than 10% at 5 years. The mean reduction in neck diameter was signifanctly different between the two groups at the two time points (p< 0.01). The rapid group had a higher proportion of valgus aligned implants (88%) and a significant decrease in reconstructed offset (p=0.0023).

The FE results support the hypothesis that the presence of a FDZ decreases load transfer to the proximal bone, resulting in increased medial stress shielding and resorption. These results are consistent with the radiological findings. In order to better understand the cause of resurfacing implant failures, additional retrieval studies are necessary.

Correspondence should be addressed to: EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH – 8005 Zürich, Switzerland. Email: office@efort.org