WEAR AND TISSUE REACTION IN RETRIEVED CERAMIC-ON-CERAMIC THA

Abstract

Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing is an attractive alternative to metal-on-polyethylene bearing due to the unique tri-bological advantages of alumina. However, despite the long-term satisfactory results obtained so far in the vast majority of patients, failure may occur in a few cases.

Clinical, radiographic, laboratory and microbiological data of 30 consecutive subjects with failed alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasties (THA) were analyzed to define if foreign body reaction to wear debris may be responsible for periprosthetic bone resorption, as in conventional metal-to-polyethylene bearings. In all cases, clinical and radiographical material was reviewed, retrieved implants were examined, and histology of periprosthetic tissues was analyzed. Massive osteolysis was never observed. Apart from 5 five patients for which revision surgery was necessary due to the occurrence of late infection, in all other cases failure had occurred due to secondary implant instability (as in the case of screwed sockets, 19 cases) or to malpositioning of the implant (5 cases). One patient suffered from chronic dislocation.

In the vast majority of cases, ceramic wear debris was absent or scarce, and did not induce any tissue reaction. In a few cases with severe wear, debris was evident in clusters of perivascular macrophages, notably in the absence of foreign body multinucleated cells, confirming the excellent biocompatibility of ceramics.

These findings indicate that wear debris and peri-prostetic bone resorption were the effect rather than the cause of failure, differently from revised metal-on-polyethylene bearings, in which foreign body cell reaction is the main pathogenetic mechanism of failure. On the contrary, mechanical problems, due to incorrect surgical technique or to inadequate prosthetic design, may cause instability of the implant, in turn resulting in wear debris production and moderate if any biological reaction.