Abstract
Radiographs are frequently ordered following acute knee injury. However, it is suggested that only 6 % of patients with a knee trauma have a fracture. Decision rules such as the Ottawa rules and the Pittsburgh rules have been developed to reduce the unnecessary use of radiographs following knee injury.
We prospectively reviewed all acute knee injury patients who were referred to our clinic from the emergency department over a 3 month period. The reason for ordering radiographs was analysed. The Ottawa and the Pittsburgh rules were applied to individual patients to evaluate the need for radiographs. In patients with a diagnosis of fracture, the accuracy of the Ottawa and the Pittsburgh rules was studied.
A total, of 106 patients were referred to the acute knee clinic from the emergency department. 95.28 % (101) of these patients had radiographs of their knee in the emergency department. Five (4.72%) patients had a fracture of their knee and all these cases, the Ottawa and the Pittsburgh knee rules for ordering radiographs was fulfilled. In a vast majority of cases without any fracture, the clinical reason for ordering radiographs was not clear. Using the Ottawa rules for knee radiography 25.47% (27) radiographs could be avoided without missing a fracture. Using the Pittsburgh rules, 30.19 % (32) knee radiographs could be avoided without missing a fracture.
The Ottawa and the Pittsburgh rules have a high sensitivity for the detection of knee fractures. Use of these rules can aid efficient clinical evaluation of the knee in an emergency situation without adverse clinical outcome. They may also have an implication on reducing the work load of radiology department and reduction of health costs.
Correspondence should be addressed to: EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH – 8005 Zürich, Switzerland. Email: office@efort.org
