4.O.07 TREATMENT AND OUTCOME OF PAROSTEAL OSTEOSARCOMA – BIOLOGICAL VERSUS ENDOPROSTHETIC RECONSTRUCTION

Abstract

Parosteal osteosarcoma is an uncommon tumour. Different methods of surgical treatment have been reported. Aim of this study was to investigate differences in outcome after biological and prosthetic reconstruction.

Since August 1969, 28 patients have been treated at our institution. Average age was 26 years, range 15 to 59 years. Patient data was retrospectively reviewed within the prospective database of the Vienna Tumour Registry. Average follow-up was 133.9 months, range 8.4 to 382.6 months. Two patients died of disease 8.4 and 81.4 months after operation, respectively, another patient died due to unrelated causes 330.4 months postoperatively. All surviving patients were followed for a minimum of 3.6 months.

Location of the lesion was the distal femur (19), proximal humerus (four), proximal tibia (three), mid-diaphyseal and proximal femur (one each). In 12 patients endoprosthetic reconstruction was indicated. Biological reconstruction was performed in 11 patients. Three patients underwent rotationplasty, two patients were amputated. Eight of 12 patients with endoprostheses have been revised, five have had multiple revisions. Causes for revision were bushing wear (four), aseptic loosening (four), infection (three) and periprosthetic fracture (one). There was no local recurrence in the endoprosthetic group. Two of 11 patients with biological reconstruction underwent revision due to pseudarthrosis and femoral fracture, respectively. There were two cases of local recurrence requiring secondary amputation. Two patients with rotationplasty underwent revision for wound healing disturbance and thrombectomy, respectively. Three patients developed lung metastases, leading to death of disease in two cases of amputation and rotationplasty. One patient with endoprosthetic reconstruction was alive 129.0 months after pulmonary metastasectomy. Functional outcome was satisfactory in all patients; there were no significant differences between patients with endoprosthetic or biological reconstruction.

Biological reconstruction showed less revisions compared to endoprostheses, however, exact preoperative planning is required to obtain clear margins of resection.