Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

3.P.17 FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION AFTER EN-BLOC RESECTION OF GIANT CELL TUMOR OF THE DISTAL RADIUS



Abstract

Giant cell tumor of the distal radius is associated with a high local recurrence rate. En bloc resection of the distal radius and reconstruction using osteoarticular allograft, curettage with PMMA blomb, and allograft arthrodesis are established methods. The aim of the study was to evaluate the functional outcome of our patients with the DASH-Score and the Mayo Wrist score.

In the last 7 years six patients were treated at our department due to a giant cell tumor of the distal radius. Two patients were primary treated with an en bloc resection. The other four were primary treated with curettage packing of the defect with polymethylmethacrylate. In two of these cases a secondary en bloc resection was performed for local recurrence. For evaluation of function in daily live we used the DASH score and the MAYO wrist score.

The mean bone resection length was 5,25cm (5–6 cm).All four patients treated with en bloc resection (primary or secondary) had no recurrence but in two out of that cases a re-operation was necessary because of non union.

At a mean follow up from 27 months (4–95) there were no recurrences or metastases at all.

The flexion/extension of the wrist in currettaged radius was 60°/80° compared with 38°/68° in reconstructed radius. The pronation/suppination was 90°/90° in the currettaged ones versus 77°/77° in the allograft replaced ones.

The functional outcome evaluated with Mayo Wrist Score and DASH score showed an excellent outcome for both groups (84/7,7 Allograft < -> 85/10 Currettage)

Functional outcome of distal radius resection reconstruction using an allograft is highly satisfactory compared with the literature, however we experienced a high risk for pseudoarthrosis. For prevention of non union simultaneous bone grafting at the index operation could be advisable.

Thus allograft reconstruction of the distal radius represents a valuable alternative to arthrodesis.

Correspondence should be addressed to Professor Stefan Bielack, Olgahospital, Klinikum Stuttgart, Bismarkstrasse 8, D-70176 Stuttgart, Germany. Email: s.bielack@klinikum_stuttgart.de