Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

BEWARE OF SRS PRESENTATIONS



Abstract

Purpose: To determine presentation to publication conversion rate(PPCR) in peer-reviewed indexed journals of abstracts presented at SRS annual meetings and to evaluate for consistency between abstracts and subsequently published full-text articles(FTA).

Methods: We reviewed all presentations (podium & posters) of past SRS annual meeting proceedings(2000–04) and undertook a comprehensive PubMed search to determine if the abstract was followed by a publication subsequent to its presentation as FTA up to Dec 2008. The published FTA was compared with original abstract(OAb) and evaluated for consistency with respect to study cohort/design, conclusion and authorship against a structured proforma.

Results: 1063 abstracts(452 podium;611 posters) were identified. 560 (295 podium;265 posters) were published as FTA in 51 journals. The overall PPCR was 52.68%(65.26 for podium;43.37% for posters). Two-thirds of them were published in Spine (361 FTA). 87.32% of them were published within 3 years of presentation(489/560). Interestingly 16 presentations were already published as FTA before their sub-mission(2.85%). The PPCR was 1.5 times higher for free-papers as compared to posters and was statistically significant (p< 0.0001) and OR 2.45(1.90–3.15).

Conclusion: The PPCR of SRS presentations is better than AAOS(34.2%;Bhandari et al, JBJS(Am)2002:84(4),615–21) and stands high in comparison to other medical specialties (32–72%). Though the studies were of high quality/content, changes to the cohort, authors or/& conclusion was common (seen in two-thirds of FTA). The acceptance of an abstract for podium presentation at SRS annual meeting is a benchmark of quality. However they (esp. posters) should be interpreted with caution until their subsequent publication as a FTA.

Ethics approval: Not applicable

Interest Statement: None (No grants obtained from any agency).

Correspondence should be addressed to BSS c/o BOA, at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE, England.