Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

FROM ROADSIDE TO REVISION HIP SURGERY: THE ROLE OF VIBRATION IMPACTION IN ACETABULAR IMPACTION BONE GRAFTING



Abstract

Introduction: Impaction bone grafting (IBG) for revision hip surgery can be a difficult surgical skill with a fine line between construct failure from insufficient compaction and intraoperative fracture from high impaction forces. Following on from our experience in the femur, in this study we used an acetabular model to test the hypothesis that the use of vibration for IBG could reduce the peak stresses thus reducing the intraoperative fracture risk and also improve the reliability and reproducibility of the impaction technique.

Methods: Revision hemi pelvis models were made (Pra-prosky Type 2a). A standard impaction technique was used for the control group, and the impactor tamps were coupled with a pneumatic hammer for the vibration group. The cavity was filled in 6 set steps with strain gauge readings taken throughout. The pelvis construct was then mechanically loaded. Graft compaction and micro motion post mechanical testing was assessed with micro CT.

Results: Vibration impaction led to a significant reduction (p=0.03) in the peak stresses during the impaction process. There was also significantly less variability in peak stresses for the vibration group compared to standard, both in sequential impactions by the same surgeon and between different surgeons. One medial wall fracture occurred in the control group only, similar to fractures encountered in the clinical situation. There was no significant difference in the degree of graft compaction or in the subsidence of the cup.

Discussion: We believe that this new technique of applying vibration to the IBG process can reduce the risk of intraoperative fracture whilst achieving good graft compaction and implant stability. This technique therefore has the potential to widen the ‘safety margins’ of IBG and reduce the learning curve allowing more widespread adoption of the technique for replacing lost bone stock.

Correspondence should be addressed to BHS c/o BOA, at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE, England.