header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

ASSESSMENT OF ANTEVERSION IN RESURFACING CUPS: VALIDATION OF EBRA AND THE PRESENTATION OF A SIMPLE CLINICAL GRADING SYSTEM



Abstract

Background: Resurfacing cups may produce significant clinical problems when placed at the extremes of version, including increased production of metal debris and psoas tendonitis.

Methods: We obtained the femoral and acetabular components of two unused ASR (Articular Surface Replacement) and BHR (Birmingham Hip Resurfacing) devices. The components were placed in moulds at varying degrees of inclination and anteversion in a grid to simulate pelvic landmarks and AP radiographic images were captured. The true radiological anteversion was determined by rotating the x-ray beam so that it was perpendicular to the acetabular axis and measuring the angle subtended by the cup rim and the vertical axis.

Five blinded orthopaedic registrars then used EBRA (Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analysis, University of Inns-bruck, Austria) software to determine the radiological anteversion from the AP films. Twenty-five ASR and twenty-five BHR images were analysed.

At the same time each observer was asked to grade the cups as “1” (< 10°) “2” (10–20°) “3” (20–30°) or “4” (> 30°) depending on the appearances of the cup vertices.

Results: Mean error for each observer was −0.7 (minimum) to 1.6° (maximum). The range of standard deviations of error for each observer was +/− 2.2 (minimum) to 3.5° (maximum). Retroverted cups were not identified in the majority of cases.

Cups graded as “1” or “4” showed high sensitivity and specificity for the true grade as determined on the lateral radiographs.

Conclusions: EBRA software can be used to calculate the anteversion of resurfacing cups to a clinically acceptable degree. The clinician must be aware of the limitations of the software most notably the difficulty in identifying a retroverted cup and errors arising from poor quality radiographs in terms of pelvic rotation. The presented clinical grading system can be used as a rapid assessment tool to identify cups at the extremes of anteversion.

Correspondence should be addressed to BHS c/o BOA, at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE, England.