Abstract
Introduction: The ideal acetabular component has low wear, permanent fixation and physiological bone loading. Recently trabecular metal has been promoted as reproducing the modulus of trabecular bone with a cementless fixation. The aim of this trial was to see if a monobloc trabecular backed polyethylene acetabular component loaded the pelvis physiologically as a cemented polyethylene component.
Method: Between 2004 and 2006 54 patients were ran-domised to a cemented polyethylene acetabular component versus a monobloc trabecular backed polyethylene acetabular component. The primary outcome measurement was bone density in peri-prosthetic acetabular regions of interest measured preoperatively and post operatively at 6 weeks and 1 year. Secondary outcomes measured were radiographic and functional outcomes (HHS and Oxford score).
Results: Radiographically 8 patients in the trabecular group had a significant gap in zone II which resolved in 6 by 1 year. The cemented group had 3 patients with a radiolucent line (zone 1) at 1 year. HHS and OXFORD scores improved with no significant difference between the groups. Both groups had significant loss of bone density in the ilium and ischium. The trabecular group produced a significant increase in bone density in the superolateral region. The cemented group produced increased bone density in the superomedial region.
Discussions and Conclusions: There is a significant reduction in BMD for both groups in the upper pelvis and ischium in keeping with finite element modelling predictions. The press-fit group relative to the cemented group resulted in decreased BMD in the superomedial peri-prosthetic region. The trabecular monobloc cup therefore behaves more like a rigid cementless shell despite the properties of trabecular metal.
Correspondence should be addressed to BHS c/o BOA, at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE, England.
