Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

CLINICAL AND FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION OF CERVICAL SPINE AFTER TWO LEVEL CERVICAL DISC REPLACEMENT



Abstract

Purpose: To assess the outcomes in consecutive 32 patients of two level cervical disc replacement

Methods: In this article, we report 2-year results of anterior cervical decompression and two level cervical disc replacements (prestige) in 32 patients with a diagnosis of symptomatic cervical spondylosis. Dynamic assessment with lateral radiographs of the cervical spine in flexion/extension was done pre and post op. All of them had partial uni/bilateral uncinectomy, which adds in lateral bending. The median age of all patients was 46 years (range 32–61). Levels of surgery included between seven C3–C7, most common were C5–6, C6–7.

Results: Neck and arm pain as well as disability scores (VAS, ODI and SF36) were significantly improved by 3 months and remained improved at 2 years. Radiography revealed the complete motion (From flexion to extension) at upper disc replacement level of 11% and 9.6% at the lower level. There is a significant decrease of the facet joint articulation overlap in the sagittal plane. As the diameter of socket is slightly larger than the ball in prestige disc replacement, it helps in additional axial movement. There was reduction in motion at the adjacent segments above and below, preventing adjacent segment problems.

Conclusion: Twenty-four months after surgery, patients who underwent two level cervical disc replacements demonstrated greater improvement in neurologic function and neck pain. It helps in restoring sagittal balance, functional outcome of patient because of increased lateral bending, axial rotations and flexion-extension.

Ethics approval: done from appropriate authorities

Interest Statement: There is no local grant, national grant, commercial/industry support for this article. There are no interest or gain from any source for this article.

Correspondence should be addressed to BASS/BCSS c/o BOA, at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE, England.