header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

FUNCTIONAL, COSMETIC AND RADIOGRAPHIC OUTCOMES FOLLOWING DIFFERENT FIXATION TECHNIQUES IN PAEDIATRIC FOREARM FRACTURES



Abstract

Introduction: We conducted a prospective study on 29 patients comparing the medium-term outcome between intramedullary nail fixation and plate fixation in paediatric forearm fractures.

Materials and Methods: The criteria were patients who had a nail (10) or plate fixation (19) for a single or both bones forearm fracture between 2004 and 2006. All these patients were recalled following ethical approval for assessment of their grip strength using a hand dynamometer, forearm and elbow range of movements, scar assessment, POSNA outcome questionnaire and new radiographic views of the forearms.

Results: Mean age of 10.4 years for both groups (4–16), All fractures were caused by low velocity falls. Grip strength is reduced in 83% of patients, comparable in both groups. Elbow flexion is more reduced in the plating group but more reduction in extension in the nailing group. The reduction in forearm pronation (69% of patients) and supination (61%) were comparable in both groups. Using the ‘Manchester scar proforma’; the plating group scored worse with 14/21; nail 11/21. ‘POSNA outcome questionnaire’ score showed the nailing group had 90% excellent or good result and plating group 74%. The moderate and poor POSNA outcome (26% plate, 10% nail) were associated with pain, restricted rotation, bad scarring and difficulty lifting heavy objects. Nails were removed after bony healing but all plates were left in situ. Complete remodeling of forearm bones were seen in all radiographs in both groups. One case of non-iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury and two cases of wound infection were noted; all made full recovery.

Conclusion: The medium-term outcome at 2.5 years following either fixation method is generally comparable and good. The obvious differences were; a higher (better) POSNA score in the nailing group, larger scar formation in plating, elbow extension restriction in nailing and elbow flexion restriction in plating group. Factors that were comparable were grip strength, forearm rotation and radiographic remodeling and outcome.

Correspondence should be addressed to BSCOS c/o BOA, at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE, England.