COMPLICATIONS OF BALLISTIC INJURIES TO THE EXTREMITIES

Abstract

Extremity injuries on the battlefield are commonly secondary to high energy mechanisms. These cause significant injury to soft tissue and bone and are contaminated. Evacuation to medical care can be difficult in the operational environment and may delay the time to initial surgery. There is already substantial literature on the complications of such injuries but this is the first report from UK forces. Our aim was to assess the complications, but specifically infections, in relation to delay in surgery and also the method of fracture stabilisation.

Military patients who had ballistic mangled extremity injuries were identified from the database (courtesy of ADMEM). Using both the trauma audit and the hospital notes, demographics were assessed. The injuries sustained (including the fractured bones), time to theatre, associated injuries, method of stabilisation at Role 3, definitive fixation and complications were noted.

81 patients were identified with 95 limbs injured (68 lower limb, 27 upper limb). The most commonly fractured bones were the tibia, radius/ulna, femur and humerus. Primary stabilisation was either ExFix (53%) or plaster (44%). Of those stabilised by ExFix, the definitive stabilisation was mainly by either a nail (44%) or plate (17%). Those stabilised by plaster mainly stayed in plaster. 72% of patients developed at least one complication, the most common of which was superficial infections. Other complications were deep infections, delayed union, haematomas, neuropathic pain and flap failures. The main organisms involved were Acinetobacter, Bacillus and Pseudomonas. There was no association between delay to theatre and decision to amputate. There was an association between the use of plaster for definitive stabilisation and superficial infection and plates for definitive stabilisation and deep infections. There was no association between time delay to theatre and infections.

This provides the first report of complications from extremity injuries secondary to ballistic missile devices in UK forces. It allows for comparison with reports from other sources on similar injuries and helps to guide further management of patients. In particular it agrees with recent civilian data that initial surgery does not have to be carried out as soon as possible, which has implications for military planning.