A PRELIMINARY CADAVERIC STUDY INVESTIGATING THE BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF VERTEBROPLASTY IN TREATING SPINAL METASTASES AND MULTIPLE MYELOMA

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In the spinal column, bone metastases (BM) and lesions arising from multiple myeloma (MM) can cause severe weakening of the vertebral body (VB) leading to an increased risk of fracture¹. These vertebral fractures may induce severe pain, deformity and increased risk of neurological deficit². At present, however, there is very little known about the mechanical behaviour either of the infiltrated vertebrae or that following vertebroplasty (VP). The purpose of this preliminary investigation was to evaluate (i) the mechanical behaviour of vertebrae with lesion involvement, and (ii) the effectiveness of VP with coblation.

METHODS: Individual vertebrae from two spines, one with MM (n=13) and one with BM secondary to bladder cancer (n=12) were dissected free of soft tissue with the posterior elements retained. Three MM vertebrae with evidence of previous fracture were excluded. Each vertebrae was fractured under an eccentric flexion load from which fracture strength and stiffness were derived³. VBs were then assigned to two groups. In group 1, lesion material was removed by coblation prior to VP and in group 2, no coblation was performed prior to VP. All vertebrae were fractured post-augmentation under the same loading protocol. At each stage microCT assessments were conducted to investigate lesion morphology and cement volume/distribution.

RESULTS: MM vertebrae were characterised by several small lesions, severe bone degradation and multiple compromise of the cortical wall. In contrast, large focal lesions were present in the BM vertebrae and the cortical wall generally remained intact. The initial failure strength of the MM vertebrae were significantly lower than BM vertebrae (L=2200N vs 950N, P< 0.001). A significant improvement in relative fracture strength was found post augmentation for both lesion-types (1.42 ± 0.51, P=0.0006). Coblation provided a marginally significant increase in the same parameter post-augmentation (P=0.08) and, qualitatively, improved the ease of injection.

CONCLUSIONS: Bladder BM and MM vertebral lesions showed significant variations in lesion morphology, bone destruction and the level of cortical wall breach, causing significant changes in the bone fracture behaviour. Account should be taken of these differences to optimise the VP intervention in terms of cement formulation and delivery. Preliminary results suggest the current VP treatment provides significant improvements in failure strength post-fracture.