A COMPREHENSIVE VALIDATION OF A NEW METHOD FOR CORRECTION OF RADIOGRAPHIC HIP PARAMETERS FOR PELVIC MALPOSITIONING

Abstract

An ample number of radiographic hip parameters on anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs vary significantly with individual pelvic tilt and rotation. We developed specific computer software Hip2Norm to perform 3D analysis of the individual hip joint morphology using 2D AP pelvic radiographs. Twenty-five parameters can be calculated for a neutral orientation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the validity of this method for tilt and rotation correction of the acetabular rim and associated radiographic parameters. The validation comprised three steps:

1. External and

2. internal validation; and

3. intra-/interobserver analysis.

A series of x-rays of 30 cadaver pelves were available for step 1 and 2. External validation comprised the comparison of radiographical parameters of the cadaver hips when determined with Hip2Norm in comparison with CT-based measurements or actual radiographs in a neutral pelvic orientation. Internal validation evaluated the consistency of the parameters when each single pelvis was calculated back from different random orientations to the same neutral pelvic position. The intra-/interob-server analysis investigated the reliability/reproducibility of all parameters with the help of 100 randomised, blinded radiographs of a consecutive patient series.

1. All but two parameters (acetabular index, ACE angle) showed a good to very correlation with the CT-measurements.

2. Internal validity was good to very good for all parameters.

3. There was a good to very good reliability and reproducibility of all parameters except five parameters.

The software could be shown to be an accurate, reliable and reproducible method for correction of AP pelvic radiographs. This computer-assisted method allows standardised evaluation of all relevant radiographic parameters for detection of anatomic morphologic differences. It will be used to study the influence of pelvic malorientation on the radiographic appearance of each individual parameter and the clinical significance of standardising pelvic parameters.