Abstract
It is established good practice that joint replacements should have regular follow-up and for the past seven years at the North Hampshire Hospital a local joint register has been used for this purpose and we compare this with results of the Swedish and UK national registries.
Since March 1999, all primary and revision knee arthroplasties performed at North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke have been prospectively recorded onto a database set up by one of the senior authors (JMB). Data from patients entered in the first six years of the register were analysed. All patients have at least one year clinical and radiological review then a minimum of yearly postal follow-up.
As of 31/12/2006, 2854 knee replacement procedures had been performed under the care of 13 consultants. OA was the most common diagnosis in over 75% of knees. 5.2% of patients had died and 4.6% were lost to follow-up. Our revision burden was 3.5% and we had a revision rate of 1.4% for primary total knee replacements. Audit of data for revisions and patello-femoral replacements has enabled us to change our practices. Mean length of stay was 7.2 days for primary total knee arthroplasty versus 4.0 days for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and 5.4 days for patellofemoral replacement and mean flexion at discharge was 88.4, 93.7 and 88.7 degrees respectively. WOMAC and Oxford scores at 2 years had improved from a mean of 52 and 21 pre-operatively to 74 and 39 respectively for primary total knee arthroplasty. Our costs are estimated at approximately £35 per patient for their lifetime on the register.
Compared to other registries:
-
Our dataset is more complete and comprehensive
-
Our costs are less
-
All patients have a unique identifier (at least 19% of UKNJR data is anonymous)
-
Our audit loops have been closed
Correspondence should be addressed to Mr T Wilton, c/o BOA, BASK at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE, England.
